Now, I
might not have a problem with this unreal bias if, like I said, they were the
home team announcers. With home announcers, you expect bias, and while
sometimes it might be out of hand – practically praising one or two players,
calling completely ridiculous things on the away team, and defending their
players no matter how cheap that shot might have been – again, it’s expected. A
home announcer doesn’t mean they’re the best, because they have their flaws
too, but with them you expect a biased opinion. They home announcer is going to
stick by their team no matter what, and are most likely going to have two
completely different tones when announcing a goal depending on which team
scored.
What’s
wrong with NBC doing this? They’re NBC – they are a national broadcaster and
should not have a home bias. With an NBC announcer, you should be able to tell
if there was a goal even if you are in another room and not fully tuned in. How
many Boston goals were clear in Game 2? If you weren’t fully tuned in because
you were playing Tiddlywinks because it wasn’t much of a close hockey game
after it was 4-1, you probably didn’t catch that the slaughter got even worse
after the 5th and 6th Boston goals. Honestly, even I was
sitting there, paying full attention to the Bruins bloodbath mauling, and I
couldn’t tell if they were goals or not, because frankly you can’t see the
goal-light, there’s no horn, and Emrick in no way made it clear that that was
indeed a goal. I had to wait another 10 seconds, which is basically an eternity
in hockey, until the scoreboard changed and I knew that it was indeed a good
goal…well not good for the Penguins, but you know what I mean. And while it was
virtually unknown that the Bruins scored a 5th and a 6th
goal, everyone within two mile radius of the TV knew exactly when the Penguins
scored their one and only goal with Emrick’s biased cheering.
I know I’m
ranting and raving like Don Cherry, but I think even with him we might know who
scored and when…it might be accompanied by a ten minute dialog about something
completely irrelevant, but you’d probably still know who scored. With Doc
Emrick, you might know the first goal, maybe the second by one team, but if it’s
not his pick, then you won’t really know who scored and when unless you look at
the scoreboard. And while everyone’s going to be biased to some extent
naturally, it’s NBC’s job to keep this as objective as possible, which just isn’t
happening right now. Perhaps the saddest thing though, is that the passion in
Emrick’s voice would be incredible if he maintained an objective point of view,
or if he was a home announcer, but he’s not doing either. Emrick might be the
prime example here, but he’s not the only one; multiple NBC announcers and even
short video skits tend to lean more towards one team winning or scoring over
the other – maybe a full two minutes mentioning the streak of one team, while
not even thirty seconds mentioning maybe a single player from the opposing
team. This NBC bias has gotten to ridiculous levels and needs to stop before it
eventually pisses off virtually every hockey fan and prevents an expanded
audience. If an announcer cannot stay objective, then they shouldn’t be the
voice of national commentary.
No comments:
Post a Comment